---
title: "Website Incident Response And Monitoring Context | Unolia"
description: "When a client site breaks, see the context around the incident: the last deploys, DNS changes, provider health and open issues, next to the failing monitor."
url: "https://unolia.com/use-cases/incident-response-monitoring"
locale: "en"
---

# When a site breaks, see the context around the incident.

Monitors, deployments, DNS and issues around every alert.

A failed monitor only says something is wrong. Unolia puts what changed, what runs the site and what was already broken next to the alert, so the investigation starts answered.

## Alerts without context create tab hunting.

Most incidents need clues from monitoring, DNS, Git, hosting and provider health at the same time. Three nights went differently because the clues shared a page.

### The alert that explained itself.

The checkout monitor went red at 21:47. The project already showed the 21:32 deploy sitting right beside it, author and message included. The rollback decision took five minutes of reading, not an hour of asking around, and the client found out from the fix, not from the outage.

### The outage that was actually DNS.

Everything pointed at hosting, and hosting was fine. The project's DNS panel told the real story: a record changed that morning, with the who and the when on the trail. Repointed in one click, and the postmortem did not need a suspect list.

### The postmortem that wrote itself.

The morning after, the review usually starts with chat archaeology. This time the trail already held the alert, the deploy, the cause and the fix in order, with timestamps. The what-happened summary took ten minutes, and it matched reality.

## The context, in the product.

Everything your monitoring forgot to bring along.

### Monitors on the project

Oh Dear monitors, their checks, incidents and history, attached to the client site they watch.

### Deployment history beside the alert

Who deployed what and when, with logs, sitting next to the monitor that went red.

### DNS state and its trail

Records, recent changes and who made them, for the incidents that turn out to be DNS.

### Provider health

Expired tokens, stale syncs and provider warnings flagged as context before they block an investigation.

### The incident, explained

Ask your AI assistant what changed. It reads the same project and lines up the likely cause, for human review.

## Monitoring alert versus project context

| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
| The monitor alerts, then the team opens five dashboards to understand the site. | The project view holds monitoring, deployments, DNS, providers and issues together. |
| Only the person who built the site can really investigate it. | Whoever is on call starts from the same context. |
| Incident knowledge disappears into chat after the fix. | The trail keeps the alert, the cause and the fix for the next review. |

## Give alerts the project context they are missing.

The next red monitor arrives with its deploys, DNS, providers and history attached. Investigations start answered.

[Join the waitlist](https://app.unolia.com/register)