---
title: "Website Maintenance Automations For Agencies | Unolia"
description: "Turn repeat website maintenance into structured runs: server updates, kernel reboots, CVE remediation, monitor creation and real-IP sync, with confirmations before and logs after."
url: "https://unolia.com/use-cases/maintenance-automations"
locale: "en"
---

# Turn repeat website maintenance into structured workflows.

Repeatable runs with confirmations and logs.

Recipes turn the maintenance your team repeats into runs that are configured once, ask before anything disruptive, and log every step under the right client.

## Manual maintenance is hard to scale safely.

The same tasks repeat across every client project, and every manual run invites drift, skipped steps and missing proof. Three chores became buttons.

### The checklist that became a button.

The update procedure lived in a doc titled FINAL-v3, and every developer ran it slightly differently. As a recipe, it runs in the same order with the same checks on every client server.

### The reboot that asked first.

Sunday-night reboots used to be one person, one terminal and crossed fingers. Now the run applies the updates, then stops at the disruptive part: 2 machines want a reboot, confirm? The click happened Monday at 09:10, in daylight, and the log shows exactly what followed.

### The monitors that create themselves.

A new client domain went live on Thursday, and the monitor-creation recipe gave it checks without anyone filing a task. When the site moved behind a CDN, the real-IP sync kept the monitors pointed at the true server. Monitoring stopped lagging behind the work.

## What a run leaves behind.

Automations you can read: what ran, what asked, what changed.

### The recipe collection

Curated maintenance recipes: Ubuntu updates, kernel reboot checks, CVE remediation, monitor creation and real-IP sync.

### Runs scoped to the project

Every run targets the project, provider or server it belongs to, and its result lands on the same page.

### Confirmations where it matters

Disruptive steps stop and ask, at a sane hour.

### Logs and step timelines

Every run keeps its steps, timings and output, attached to the client project it touched.

### Manual, scheduled or event-driven

Run recipes by hand, on daily schedules, or from events, as your plan allows.

## Manual checklist versus automation run

| Before | After |
| --- | --- |
| A developer follows a checklist and remembers to report what happened. | The workflow records steps, confirmations, logs and status in the project. |
| Every client site gets a slightly different maintenance process. | Recipes make one baseline that still keeps human review where it matters. |
| Disruptive actions run from silent background scripts, or not at all. | Disruptive steps wait for a click from a human, at a sane hour. |

## Make recurring maintenance inspectable.

One repeat task, turned into a run your team configures once and trusts after.

[Join the waitlist](https://app.unolia.com/register)