Skip to content
Incident context

When a site breaks, see the context around the incident.

A failed monitor only says something is wrong. Unolia puts what changed, what runs the site and what was already broken next to the alert, so the investigation starts answered.

Works with the providers behind your monitors, deploys and DNS Amazon Route 53 Bento Bunny.net Cloudflare DigitalOcean Gandi GitHub GitLab Ionos Laravel Cloud Laravel Forge Mailgun Namecheap Oh Dear OVHcloud Ploi Porkbun Vultr
The real problem

Alerts without context create tab hunting.

Most incidents need clues from monitoring, DNS, Git, hosting and provider health at the same time. These are the nights that went differently because the clues shared a page.

The alert that explained itself.

The checkout monitor went red at 21:47. The project already showed the 21:32 deploy sitting right beside it, author and message included. The rollback decision took five minutes of reading, not an hour of asking around, and the client found out from the fix, not from the outage.

Read more →

The outage that was actually DNS.

Everything pointed at hosting, and hosting was fine. The project's DNS panel told the real story: a record changed that morning, with the who and the when on the trail. Repointed in one click, and the postmortem did not need a suspect list.

Read more →

The postmortem that wrote itself.

The morning after, the review usually starts with chat archaeology. This time the trail already held the alert, the deploy, the cause and the fix in order, with timestamps. The what-happened summary took ten minutes, and it matched reality.

Read more →
The value

Minutes matter. Context is the shortcut.

Everything the alert forgot to mention.

The monitor says the site is down. The project says everything else: the last deploys with their authors, the recent DNS changes, provider health, the issues already open. The first minute of an incident becomes reading, not hunting.

Anyone can take the incident.

On call stops requiring tribal knowledge. Whoever is on duty opens the same project as everyone else, reads what changed, and decides. The person who wrote the code stays asleep, and the next morning’s review starts from the trail instead of from memories.

The monitors

Monitors that live where the work is.

Create monitors, tune their checks and triage alerts from the project, next to the deploys and providers they watch. When one goes red, it is already surrounded by its context, and the incident starts with a head start.

Read more →
Proof

The context, in the product.

Unolia is not another uptime tool. It is everything your monitoring forgot to bring along.

Monitors on the project
Oh Dear monitors, their checks, incidents and history, attached to the client site they watch.
Deployment history beside the alert
Who deployed what and when, with logs, sitting next to the monitor that went red.
DNS state and its trail
Records, recent changes and who made them, for the incidents that turn out to be DNS.
Provider health
Expired tokens, stale syncs and provider warnings flagged as context before they block an investigation.
The incident, explained
Ask your AI assistant what changed. It reads the same project and lines up the likely cause, for human review.
The shift

Monitoring alert versus project context

Before

The monitor alerts, then the team opens five dashboards to understand the site.

With Unolia

The project view holds monitoring, deployments, DNS, providers and issues together.

Before

Only the person who built the site can really investigate it.

With Unolia

Whoever is on call starts from the same context.

Before

Incident knowledge disappears into chat after the fix.

With Unolia

The trail keeps the alert, the cause and the fix for the next review.

Give alerts the project context they are missing.

The next red monitor arrives with its deploys, DNS, providers and history attached. Investigations start answered.

Join the waitlist See pricing →